Child Protection Investigation Specialist (CPIS) Practice Exam

What is the most appropriate action when reviewing evidence for inclusion in a child protection investigation?

1. Consult with a legal expert

2. Consult with the non-offending caregiver

3. Consult with a supervisor

4. Consult with law enforcement

The correct answer is: Consult with a supervisor

When reviewing evidence for inclusion in a child protection investigation, consulting with a supervisor is the most appropriate action. A supervisor possesses the experience and knowledge necessary to provide guidance on how to interpret evidence within the context of policies and procedures specific to child protection. They can also ensure that the investigation adheres to legal and ethical standards, as well as provide support in making critical decisions regarding the direction of the case. Additionally, consulting with a supervisor promotes collaboration and accountability within the investigative team. They can offer insights into best practices, recommend necessary adjustments in approach, and help prioritize evidence based on the severity and nature of the case. This creates a well-rounded investigative strategy that ultimately prioritizes the safety and well-being of the child involved. While seeking guidance from various stakeholders, such as legal experts or law enforcement, has its importance in certain contexts, the supervisor plays a pivotal role in the ongoing process of investigation and decision-making. This collaboration ensures that evidence is evaluated comprehensively and in alignment with the overarching goal of child protection.