Child Protection Investigation Specialist (CPIS) Practice Exam

What describes corroborating evidence in a child protection investigation?

1. Evidence that conflicts with existing facts

2. Evidence that is entirely anecdotal

3. Evidence that strengthens or confirms other evidence

4. Evidence that is incomplete or lacking

The correct answer is: Evidence that strengthens or confirms other evidence

Corroborating evidence plays a crucial role in child protection investigations as it serves to strengthen or affirm existing evidence. When investigating claims related to child safety, professionals seek to validate allegations through multiple sources. This kind of evidence does not merely stand alone; rather, it reinforces other findings by providing additional support or confirming details that align with the initial claims. For instance, if a child reports abuse, corroborating evidence could include medical reports, witness statements, or physical evidence that substantiates the child’s account. This multifaceted approach is essential, as it creates a more robust and reliable foundation for the investigation, thereby increasing the likelihood of addressing the child's needs effectively and ensuring their safety. The other options do not reflect the nature of corroborating evidence accurately. Conflict with existing facts does not support claims; anecdotal evidence lacks the reliability necessary for substantiation; and incomplete or lacking evidence does not contribute to a solid investigative framework. Therefore, identifying corroborating evidence as that which strengthens or confirms other evidence is essential for the integrity of child protection processes.